Table 4.10 Epidemiological studies of exposure to EMF and cancer at all sites


Reference;
type of study;
country
Cohort description
Exposure
classification
All cancers
Comments
No. of cases
RR for casesa (95% CI)

(Tynes et al., 1992);
cohort,
Norway
37945 male workers (age 20-70) followed 1961-85 in the Cancer Registry of Norway 12 electrical occupations
3806 1.1 (1.0-1.1) SIR adjusted for age
(Sahl et al., 1993);
cohort,
California (USA)
Southern California Edison Company utility workers, mortality from 1960-88, 36221 workers in cohort Electrical occupations in utility 261 1.1 (0.92-1.3) Internal cohort RR, adjusted for age
(Thériault et al., 1994);
case-control,
Canada and France
Male utility workers in 3 large companies: base population of 223292; 4151 cancer cases; 6106 controls. Cumulative exposure from job history and magnetic field JEM
Cumulative magnetic fields
> median > 3.1 mT - year 2158 1.0 (0.91-1.1)
> 90th percentile > 16 µT - year 443 1.0 (0.86-1.2)
OR, adjusted for social class from case-control analysis with magnetic field JEM
(Savitz & Loomis, 1995);
cohort,
USA
138905 men employed for > 6 months in 5 electric utilities were followed for mortality from 1950-86
Cumulative magnetic fieldsTotal exposure:
highest category, > 4.3 µT-year 505 1.2 (1.1-1.4)
exposure response, RR/µT-year 4833 1.0 (1.0-1.0)
Internal cohort RR, adjusted for age, year, race, class, work status, PCBs, and solvent exposures
Past 2-10 years:
highest category, > 0.7 µT-year 746 1.1 (1.0-1.3)
exposure response, RR/µT-year 4833 1.1 (1.0-1.2)
(Guénel et al., 1996)
case-control,
France
EDF cohort of (Thériault et al., 1994); 170000 men in cohort with 1915 cases of cancer matched to 7568 controls
Cumulative electric fields
highest category > 414 V/m-year 195 0.89 (0.74-1.1)
exposure response, OR per 500 V/m-year 986 0.89 (0.75-1.0)
OR, adjusted for social class

PCB, polychlorinated biphenyl

aAll RRs are normalized to the null hypothesis = 1.0