type of study; country |
classification |
|||||||||||||
(Tynes et al., 1992); cohort, Norway |
37945 male workers (age 20-70) followed 1961-85 in the Cancer Registry of Norway | 12 electrical occupations |
3806 | 1.1 (1.0-1.1) | SIR adjusted for age | |||||||||
(Sahl et al., 1993); cohort, California (USA) |
Southern California Edison Company utility workers, mortality from 1960-88, 36221 workers in cohort | Electrical occupations in utility | 261 | 1.1 (0.92-1.3) | Internal cohort RR, adjusted for age | |||||||||
(Thériault et al., 1994); case-control, Canada and France |
Male utility workers in 3 large companies: base population of 223292; 4151 cancer cases; 6106 controls. Cumulative exposure from job history and magnetic field JEM |
|
OR, adjusted for social class from case-control analysis with magnetic field JEM | |||||||||||
(Savitz & Loomis, 1995); cohort, USA |
138905 men employed for > 6 months in 5 electric utilities were followed for mortality from 1950-86 |
|
Internal cohort RR, adjusted for age, year, race, class, work status, PCBs, and solvent exposures | |||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
(Guénel et al., 1996) case-control, France |
EDF cohort of (Thériault et al., 1994); 170000 men in cohort with 1915 cases of cancer matched to 7568 controls |
|
OR, adjusted for social class | |||||||||||
aAll RRs are normalized to the null hypothesis = 1.0